Every day until the Oscars ceremony we’ll be highlighting a different category or movie here on the LAMB! Here’s a link to all the posts written so far: http://www.largeassmovieblogs.com/2017/01/the-lamb-devours-the-oscars-2017-roster.html
Today, Matthew Stewart from Simplistic Reviews discussed who he thinks will be going home with the Best Director award.
Unlike previous Oscar seasons, this year’s crop of directors features a wide assortment of talent and comebacks. From Canadians to up-start wunderkinds and throw in a few grizzled veterans, this is one category that is sure to divide as well as surprise when the winner is announced on February 26th.
Damien Chazelle – La La Land (WINNER)
Barry Jenkins – Moonlight
Denis Villeneuve – Arrival
Kenneth Lonergan – Manchester By the Sea
Mel Gibson – Hacksaw Ridge
This could be a lot tighter than most people think, but I think the smart money is still on Chazelle to win. Again, La La Land is about Hollywood and the Hollywood Dream, and I think sentimentality will play a key role in the win. Plus, it takes a lot of co-ordination and “direction” to make those dance numbers happen and look as perfect as they are.
The one thing that could play in some of the other nominees favor, namely Barry Jenkins, who could steal this one away, is the over saturation of Land and the high that Moonlight is riding. Would the members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences dare make a statement so huge as to award Jenkins, who would be the first African-American to win the award, and the first African-American to be nominated since 2013, and only the 4th since 1991, the Oscar for Best Director? For one, it would be well deserved as Moonlight is possibly the greatest film of the year, it just so happened to be released the same year there happened to be a revival musical that captured the imagination of millions.
I might also be a little impartial to Jenkins just because of the fact that he’s local to Miami, my hometown, and he created a film about what he experienced growing up in inner-city Miami. Much like John Singleton with Boyz n the Hood, Jenkins is covering what the mainstream media likely don’t care to cover and make light of even though it affects thousands in similar situations. It’s master class work.
As for Gibson, Lonergan, and Villeneuve, it’s pretty much better luck next time, but I would like to bring up Gibson’s return to the grand stage. This is Gibson’s first nomination since 1995’s Braveheart, which he won for, but also his first nomination since becoming a pariah to the human race, and hey, I’m not excusing anti-Semitic remarks, drunken rants, and just overall disgusting behavior, but hey, those things just might make you the next POTUS. I don’t think there’s ever been an issue with Gibson’s eye for direction. The Passion of the Christ might be painful to watch, but it’s still artfully directed. And say what you will about Apocolypto, but it’s an exciting and interesting look into a culture that we know so little about. Much like We Were Soldiers Gibson takes what he learned from that film, I feel, and injected heart, grit, and soul into a true story that is often looked over.
With all this being said, look for Chazelle to take home the gold, but don’t be surprised if Jenkins is able to strip it away at the last minute.
What do you think of this year’s nominated directors?
Tags: Simplistic Reviews